話題“應該取消考試嗎”的分析

　　Should The Examination Be Abolished?

Look at the picture. There are two middle school students in it. Each has an examination paper in his hand. The one With a high score looks very happy while the other with a low score is quite sad. But, does the former have greater:ability than the latter? Is the examination the best way to check the student＇s ability?

The examination now plays a very important role in the realm ofeducation. It is used to decide who the best students are, who should be praised and who should be admitted in universities.

But the examination may make people think that gaining high marks only is siftficient. But in fact, it is not the case. The students who don＇t study diligently may score high by hard reciting and be considered as successfulstudents. This is unfair. "Excellence" ought to be awarded to the really all-round students.

As a result, the examination should be combined with other means to measure the students knowledge and capability. A few questions given in the examination can not cover the whole field of the subject. Emphasis should also be put on checking the students ability to apply.

應該取消考試嗎?

圖中有兩名中學生，每人手中拿着一份試卷，高分的看起來很高興，而低分的卻情緒低落，但是，前者的能力真的`比後者強嗎?考試是檢驗學生能力的最好方法嗎?

考試在當今教育中有舉足輕重的作用，它被用來判定誰是最好的學生，誰應該受表揚以及誰應該進入大學。

但考試可能使人認爲取得高分就足夠了，但事實並非如此。學習不好的通過死記硬背也可能得高分，從而被作爲成功的學生，這不公平，“優秀”應屬於那些全面發展的學生。

所以考試應與其他的方法聯繫起來測量學生的知識和能力。考試中的幾個問題不能覆蓋該科的全部，重點也應該放在檢查學生的應用能力上。