Fukushima Watch: Authority Chairman Not Convinced Level 3 Needed
Just a week after Japan’s nuclear regulator declared the leak of radioactive water at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant big enough for a Level 3 incident rating, the regulator’s head is wondering publicly if it really deserved that rating after all.
Based on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, a Level 3 rating is considered a “serious incident.” For the sake of comparison, the 2005 leak of 83,000 liters of radioactive waste at the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing site in the U.K. was also given a Level 3 rating on the International Atomic Energy Agency’s scale. Both the Fukushima Daiichi and the Chernobyl disasters were assigned the scale’s highest Level 7 rating.
While it might seem like Tokyo Electric +1.60%, the plant’s operator, would h******e a precise measurement of the amount of water that had been leaked, the current incident actually started with puddles discovered outside a storage tank of contaminated water. When workers subsequently checked the levels of the 1,000 metric ton water tank, they found only 700 tons. The missing water was presumed to h******e drained into a surrounding trench.
“We don’t think the leak was exactly 300 tons,” said Shunichi Tanaka, chairman of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, said at a regular press conference on Wednesday. “It could be much more or much less,” he added, saying that Tepco calculated the amount based on the assumption that the tank had been full.
“300 tons is a huge amount. If workers patrolled twice a day without noticing it leaking, I don’t understand,” Mr. Tanaka told reporters. “It wouldn’t be desirable, but we would h******e to change the rating if the leak turns out to be much smaller.”
Tepco has been forced to deal with ever-rising contaminated water levels at the Fukushima plant since the March 11, 2011 disaster. Given the sheer scope of containing the disaster, the way the utility has managed the plant has been very disorganized.
More In Fukushima Watch
Fukushima Watch: Previous Experiments With Ice Walls
Fukushima Watch: Where Did the Water Go?
Fukushima Watch: A Level 3 Incident at Daiichi
Fukushima Watch: Tepco Finally Gets an Official Cleanup Plan
Fukushima Watch: Tepco Eyes Another Rate Hike To Swing To Profit
in the latest leak, a panel investigation has revealed that only nine people supervised roughly 1,000 tanks at the site with two of them on a rotation shift. They patrolled the tanks twice a day to check if there are any signs of leaks, but they didn’t make records.
On Tuesday, Tepco said it would increase the number of patrollers to about 60 people.
“I h******e not been convinced with the data from Tepco. We need to collect more to make our own judgment,” said Mr. Tanaka.
The supposedly huge water leak is reminiscent of a case this past April, when Tepco announced up to 167 tons of contaminated water leaked from underground storage pools. At that time, Tepco hurriedly calculated the number and announced it to the public. But several weeks later, it revised down the amount sharply to about a few dozens liters after careful double checks.
A Tepco spokeswoman said “it’s true that we calculated 300 tons. We cannot say whether we will or we won’t change it later.”
在日本核能監管人員公佈福島核設施放射性廢水泄漏以足以達到3級一週後,監管負責人則公開質疑這是否真的達到這一評級。
基於國際核及放射性事件等級表,3級則被認為是“嚴重事故”。與之相較,2005年英國Sellafield核處理設施83000升放射性廢物泄漏也被國際原子能機構評定為3級。福島與切爾諾貝利災難都被評定為最高的7級。
儘管似乎該設施經營者,東電公司,可能對泄漏水的數量有精確測量,但目前的事件實際上最早於污染水處理箱外的水坑中發現的。當工人隨後檢查1000噸水箱時,他們發現僅剩700噸。缺少的水推定是流入了附近的溝渠中。
“我認為泄漏量不是正好300噸,”核監管局主席Shunichi Tanaka週三在常規媒體會議上説道。“這可能多很多或是少很多,”他又説道,並稱Tepco測算的數據是基於水箱是裝滿的.這一假設。
“300噸是個大數目。如果工人們每天巡查兩次卻未能注意到漏水,我無法理解,”Tanaka先生對記者説道,“這不是人們所想要的,但如果泄漏數量的確小很多,我們將不得不改變評級。”
自2011年3月11日地震後,Tepco被迫處理福島核電站不斷增高的污染水量。縱觀除災過程,該設施管理方式十分紊亂。在最近的泄漏中,小組調查披露只有9人監管近1000個水箱,採用2人輪班制。他們每天兩次巡查水箱以檢查十分有漏水跡象,但他們並未做記錄。
週二,Tepco表示其將把巡查人員人數增加到約60人。“我不相信Tepco的數據。我們需要收集更多資料做出我們自己的判斷,”Tanaka先生説道。
這一推測的大量水泄漏讓人想起了4月份的一次事件。當時Tepco宣佈有167噸受污染水從地下儲水池中泄漏。當時,Tepco匆忙計算數據並將之公之於眾。但在幾周後,其在進行仔細的二次核查後將數據減為僅有幾十升。
Tepco的一名發言人表示“我們的確測算為300噸。但我們沒法説之後我們會不會改變數據。”
-
西遊記作文實用3篇
無論是在學校還是在社會中,大家都不可避免地會接觸到作文吧,作文根據寫作時限的不同可以分為限時作文和非限時作文。為了讓您在寫作文時更加簡單方便,以下是小編整理的西遊記作文3篇,僅供參考,歡迎大家閲讀。西遊記作文篇1取經完後,孫悟空回了花果山。過的好不自在!誰...
-
西遊記作文[經典8篇]
在平凡的學習、工作、生活中,大家都嘗試過寫作文吧,作文是從內部言語向外部言語的過渡,即從經過壓縮的簡要的、自己能明白的語言,向開展的、具有規範語法結構的、能為他人所理解的外部語言形式的轉化。寫起作文來就毫無頭緒?以下是小編幫大家整理的西遊記作文8篇,僅...
-
數學評課稿【精】
作為一名教學工作者,很有必要精心設計一份評課稿,評課的類型很多,有同事之間互相學習、共同研討評課;有學校領導診斷、檢查的評課;有上級專家鑑定或評判的評課等。我們該怎麼去寫評課稿呢?以下是小編整理的數學評課稿,僅供參考,大家一起來看看吧。數學評課稿1宋老師的...
-
讀西遊記作文(合集)
在平平淡淡的日常中,大家最不陌生的就是作文了吧,寫作文是培養人們的觀察力、聯想力、想象力、思考力和記憶力的重要手段。相信寫作文是一個讓許多人都頭痛的問題,下面是小編收集整理的讀西遊記作文10篇,歡迎大家分享。讀西遊記作文篇1在人們的傳統觀念中,神仙都是...
相關文章
- unit6 How long have you been collecting shells的評課稿
- Unit 6 I like music that I can dance to評課稿範文
- 英語四級考試備考作文Protecting the Intangible Cultural Heritages訓練題
- 酒店英語:抱怨服務Complaining about the Service
- i recall with embarrassing clarity the flavor of those particular ashes ?
- 外研社英語Module5Unit2《There are fourteen peaches》課後反思
- 關於暑假計劃英語作文:Plan for the Coming Summer Holiday
- Adoption of the Declaration of Human Rights演講稿
- 茶和中國的茶文化Tea and the Tea Culture of China作文
- Could you tell me how to get to the National Stadium ?評課稿大綱